Taiwan's indigenous group loses court battle for hunting rights

[kafa88]

Taiwan's indigenous communities lost an eight-year legal battle for hunting rights. Indigenous groups can only hunt on certain days using homemade rifles and require special permission to do so.Campaigners argued that hunting wild animals was culturally important to them.But Taiwan's top court ruled that although some of the current rules are unconstitutional. But it will not overturn such rules because of environmental protection. "Equally important"

The constitution ensures both the protection of indigenous peoples' rights to cultivate hunting culture and protect the environment and ecosystems," said Hsu Tzong-li, chief judge of Taiwan's Constitutional Court.For Taiwan's 16 recognized indigenous groups, these hunting restrictions are a sign of discrimination and discrimination. Indigenous groups make up 2.5% of the Taiwanese population and face lower wages, higher unemployment rates and worse health than most Han Chinese.


What is the case about?

Friday's ruling is a summary of a slotxo ผ่านเว็บ lengthy legal battle sparked by the Hunters indictment in 2013.Tama Talum, 62, is a member of the Bunun tribe who was sentenced to three and a half years for killing two protected animals with a modified rifle.He said he was hunting for food for his mother, who was used to eating wild game.Activists argued that subsistence hunting was an integral part of indigenous culture and that homemade gun hunting was dangerous. They want Taiwan's gun laws to be expanded so that indigenous people can hunt with registered firearms.The case was made to the Supreme Court, although it kept his conviction and verdict. But asked the Constitutional Court to consider the current hunting law.Years of previously abandoned hunting, such as deer and muntjac monkeys, are in danger of extinction - but since commercial hunting was banned in 1989, the species has begun to recover. Indigenous activists said subsistence hunting did not prevent this recovery.


What did the court say?

In Friday's ruling, the Constitutional Court's 15-member judiciary said some of the rules were unconstitutional, namely the requirement that Indigenous peoples have to pre-authorize hunting and specify how many animals they expect. kill But the judge said they would not lift gun restrictions that mean hunters use homemade rifles or banning protected hunters to kill.Talum said the ruling was "regrettable" and that he would not stop hunting.We should be able to get a good gun.

Why do we still use a homemade gun that is dangerous and easy to disengage?"He ceased to worry that hunting could lead to the destruction of protected species, saying that indigenous people only hunt on subsistence levels.Hsieh Meng-yu, a lawyer from the Legal Aid Foundation, said that although the ruling was "90%" against Talum, this was the first time the court recognized indigenous hunting as "a" human race. " "Cultural rights should be respected and protected by state".He added that they would now argue with each other to request a suspension for Talum.

[candymika]

The site is so active, where did you find the information about this post? I have read a few articles on your website and I really like your style. Thanks, and please continue to be productive.
geometry dash